henrik-hamilton 🇩🇰 2013-03-14 00:43
Hallo Mr Artscan I like your albums very much. It seems that you know a lot about art with children. Maybe you can help me. I'm looking for a special painting. Clould you please contact me, and I will explain. My adress is in my profile
Hallo Mr Artscan I like your albums very much. It seems that you know a lot about art with children. Maybe you can help me. I'm looking for a special painting. Clould you please contact me, and I will explain. My adress is in my profile
artscan 🇬🇧 2013-01-15 14:13
"If you think you're going out with me, that figgur, you're very much mistook, Sir! - where's your gloves?" c.1860.
"If you think you're going out with me, that figgur, you're very much mistook, Sir! - where's your gloves?" c.1860.
artscan 🇬🇧 2013-03-26 22:15 в ответ sarastatten
No. I think nude pictures of children would have to have been sexually explicit in the 1800s for them to count as obscene. O.G. Rejlander was a respected Victorian photographer.
No. I think nude pictures of children would have to have been sexually explicit in the 1800s for them to count as obscene. O.G. Rejlander was a respected Victorian photographer.