maurydel 🇵🇱 2022-11-28 16:09
No teen destroyed more the planet than her. By exploiting the nature topic for political purposes, billions of euros and dollars have been lost for absurd causes, while real ecological urgent issues are not funded. CO2 is life, weak temperature increasing is not a major issue and probably CO2 effect is weak on it. Scientists never shown anything proving its effect: GIEC recorded articles are prediction models BASED ON THE HYPOTHESIS ON CO2 EFFECT. They cannot prove their main hypothesis, it is circular reasoning. All this shit is made for destroying the liberal society in order to replace it by a malthusian (communist) system. If the mad sect of climatists succeeds, the result will be millions of dies and a destroyed environment.
No teen destroyed more the planet than her. By exploiting the nature topic for political purposes, billions of euros and dollars have been lost for absurd causes, while real ecological urgent issues are not funded. CO2 is life, weak temperature increasing is not a major issue and probably CO2 effect is weak on it. Scientists never shown anything proving its effect: GIEC recorded articles are prediction models BASED ON THE HYPOTHESIS ON CO2 EFFECT. They cannot prove their main hypothesis, it is circular reasoning. All this shit is made for destroying the liberal society in order to replace it by a malthusian (communist) system. If the mad sect of climatists succeeds, the result will be millions of dies and a destroyed environment.
dausha 🇳🇱 2023-09-10 14:22 в ответ lichtuspampus
ik ook, zonder condoom want die zijn slecht voor het milieu
ik ook, zonder condoom want die zijn slecht voor het milieu
